Published in Radiology, New Research Challenges Existing Screening Recommendations
In a breakthrough study published in the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), researchers have shed new light on breast cancer screening practices. The study, led by Dr. Debra L. Monticciolo, has revealed compelling evidence in favor of annual breast cancer screening beginning at age 40 and continuing through at least age 79.
Breast cancer remains a significant health concern for women in the United States. Ranking as the second most common cause of cancer death. Despite the well-documented effectiveness of regular screening mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality by 40%. A staggering percentage of eligible women—only 50% or less—actually participate in annual screening.
Dr. Monticciolo noted the ongoing debate surrounding breast cancer screening recommendations, particularly regarding the age at which to commence screening and its frequency. The 2009 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) advocating for biennial screening starting at age 50 resulted in a decline in screening participation nationwide. However, the USPSTF revised its stance in 2023, suggesting biennial screening between ages 40 and 74. In contrast, organizations such as the American College of Radiology, the Society of Breast Imaging, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorse annual screening for women at average risk beginning at age 40.
The study conducted by Dr. Monticciolo and her team involved a secondary analysis of Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) 2023 median estimates of breast cancer screening outcomes. CISNET modeling provided the opportunity to estimate screening outcomes at various frequencies and starting ages using U.S. data.
Comparing four different screening scenarios—biennial screening of women aged 50-74, biennial screening of women aged 40-74, annual screening of women aged 40-74, and annual screening of women aged 40-79. The researchers found that annual screening of women aged 40-79 resulted in the highest mortality reduction at 41.7%. Additionally, this approach showed the lowest per mammogram false-positive screens (6.5%) and benign biopsies (0.88%) compared to other scenarios.
Dr. Monticciolo emphasized the importance of their findings, stating that annual screening from age 40 to 79 provides the highest mortality reduction, most cancer deaths averted, and most years of life gained. She highlighted the manageable nature of screening risks compared to the potential lethality of advanced breast cancer.
The USPSTF’s concerns include recall rates and benign biopsies as potential harms. Dr. Monticciolo underscored the manageable nature of these risks compared to the benefits of early cancer detection. She urged primary care physicians to recognize the tremendous benefits of annual screening for women aged 40. Additionally, emphasized the need to prioritize women’s lives by adopting early detection strategies.
The study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting annual screening from age 40. Breast cancer being easier to treat when detected early. The findings underscore the importance of regular screening in saving lives and reducing the burden of advanced-stage disease.
Dr. Monticciolo expressed hope that the study’s findings would encourage policymakers to prioritize annual screening from age 40. Thus ensuring that more women have access to life-saving early detection measures.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
According to a new study published in the online issue of Neurology®, women with multiple sclerosis (MS) are less likely to have breast cancers detected through routine cancer screenings than women without MS.
According to a new study published in the online issue of Neurology®, women with multiple sclerosis (MS) are less likely to have breast cancers detected through routine cancer screenings than women without MS.
Researchers looked at health care data for 14.8 million people in Ontario to see if there were any individuals diagnosed with breast or colorectal cancer who also had MS. For the study, they compared 351 women with breast cancer and MS to 1,404 women with breast cancer but no MS. They also identified 54 people with colorectal cancer and MS, and compared these to 216 people with colorectal cancer and no MS.
The team discovered that routine screening revealed breast cancer in 103 (29%) of the women with MS, and in 529 (38%) of the women without MS. After controlling for age, diagnosis year, and income, they found women with MS had a 32% decreased chance of having breast cancer diagnosed through routine screening.
“Disability from MS increases with age, as does cancer risk, so it is likely that those with MS may find it more difficult to get regular mammograms as they get older,” said study author Ruth Ann Marrie, MD.
Researchers also discovered that 21% of people with MS and breast cancer, and 33% of those with MS and colorectal cancer, had a level of impairment that required long-term care. “More research is needed regarding the role of MS-related disability on screenings,” states Marrie.
One limitation was the study did not include the time period from when a person first noticed cancer symptoms to when they told their doctor. “People experiencing marginalization due to race or ethnicity have different access to cancer screening, and this may be exacerbated among people with MS,” said Marrie. She stated that race and ethnicity data were not accessible for this study and that future research should look into it.
Regular screenings can help find cancers earlier before they have a chance to spread. Below are the American Cancer Society’s recommendations on breast cancer screening:
According to the CDC, some of the warning signs of breast cancer include:
If you notice any of these symptoms or something else that concerns you, schedule an appointment with your doctor right away.
If you are facing surgery for breast cancer, or are considering surgery to decrease your risk of developing breast cancer – Breast Advocate® is for you.
Breast cancer is still the most prevalent cancer diagnosed in women in the United States and the second greatest cause of cancer mortality. According to the American Cancer Society, more than 281,550 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 49,290 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed this year.
Recent data published by the American Cancer Society shows black women have a 40% higher death rate from breast cancer than white women. The disparity is even greater among women under the age of 50: the death rate among young black women is double that of young white women. Unfortunately, advancements in treatment have not benefited all groups equally.
Research shows the reasons for the disparity in breast cancer outcomes is complex. Disparities may be explained in part by social, economic, and behavioral factors. Diabetes, heart disease, and obesity are more common among black women, all of which are risk factors for breast cancer. It is becoming more obvious that tumor biology also plays a role. Triple-negative breast cancer and inflammatory breast cancer strike black women disproportionately, and they are more likely to be detected at younger ages and at later stages of the illness.
“It is widely known in the medical community that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are prevalence in the Jewish community, but what is not widely known is that they are also prevalent in Black women,” shares Debra Monticciolo, vice-chair of the department of radiology and chief of breast imaging at Baylor Scott and White Medical Center. “We also know that Black women have higher death rates and these women have a twofold increased risk for triple-negative breast cancer.”
According to research published in Annals of Internal Medicine, biannual mammography screening starting at the age of 40 might lower breast cancer-related mortality among black women by 15%.
“Minority women should begin screening for breast cancer at age 40 years instead of age 45 or 50 years, as they are 72% more likely to be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer younger than the age of 50 years, 58% more likely to have advanced breast cancer at presentation younger than age 50 years, and 127% more likely to die younger than age 50 years compared with white women. We are failing Black women,” continues Monticciolo.
Women with greater resources (such as higher levels of education and wealth) may be better able to take advantage of healthcare breakthroughs. Cities that have tackled this issue by expanding access to state-of-the-art mammography facilities have shown great success in closing the breast cancer mortality disparity between black and white women.
There is a constant debate on whether screening mammograms offer a significant benefit to patients.
In the American Cancer Society journal, CANCER, a Swedish study has found that early mammogram screenings can significantly reduce the number of deaths from metastatic breast cancer.
The study evaluated 549,091 women, covering approximately 30% of the screening‐eligible population in Sweden. The results showed that women who had regular screening mammograms had a statistically significant 41% reduction in their risk of dying of breast cancer within 10 years, and a 25% reduction in the rate of advanced breast cancers, compared to individuals who did not participate in mammogram screenings. According to the study, these benefits appeared to be independent of recent changes in patient treatment regimens.
The study concludes that the “benefits of participating in mammography screening are truly substantial and save lives through early detection, lives that otherwise would have been lost under the prevailing therapy at the time of diagnosis.”
This study offers encouraging insight into the benefits of regular breast cancer screening. It is important for both women and men to discuss their overall risk of developing breast cancer to determine the best time to begin screening, and how often they should be screened.
Performing monthly at-home self-breast exams is also a very important, free screening tool everyone should practice in addition to regular radiologic screening. However, this should not replace the imaging screening recommended by your healthcare team.
If access to care or cost is keeping you from following through with your recommended breast cancer screening appointment, please check out the Financial Assistance tab within the Resource section in the Breast Advocate app.
Women with extremely dense breast tissue have a 4 to 6 times increased risk of developing breast cancer, and their cancers are also less likely to be detected on a mammogram. About 50% of women have dense breasts.
New laws in many US states were recently passed requiring mammogram reports to include information on the density of a woman’s breast tissue. Dense breast tissue is a risk factor for breast cancer and can make detecting breast cancer more difficult with screening mammograms alone. For this reason, more research is underway to determine how to best screen for cancer in women with dense breasts.
So what are “dense breasts”? Breasts consist of fibrous glandular tissue and fat. Dense breasts contain more fibrous tissue and less fat. On a mammogram, dense fibrous tissue has the same white appearance as a breast cancer. This can make it very difficult for radiologists to spot the breast cancer.
A long-standing question is whether or not women with dense breasts should undergo additional imaging screening tests in combination with mammograms. A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine offers new insight supporting the addition of MRI screening to mammograms for women with extremely dense breast tissue.
The study was conducted in the Netherlands. 40,373 women between the ages of 50 and 75 years with extremely dense breasts and normal screening mammograms were randomized to undergo additional screening via MRI, or receive no additional screening. The study results showed the mammogram plus MRI group experienced 50% fewer interval cancers than the mammogram-only group during a 2-year period (2.5 vs 5 per 1,000 screenings, respectively). The tumors detected on MRI were smaller, of an earlier stage, and more likely to be node-negative than those detected in the mammography-only group.
This study suggests that a combination of mammograms and MRIs can be beneficial for women with extremely dense breast tissue in detecting breast cancer at an earlier stage than mammograms alone. However, it is important to note the results of this study do not suggest adding MRIs will decrease the death rates from breast cancer.
It is important to discuss your screening options with your health care team to see if additional MRI imaging would be beneficial for you based on your specific situation and risk of developing breast cancer.
From 2010 to 2020, breast cancer mortality among women aged 20-49 significantly declined across all subtypes and racial/ethnic groups. This was particularly evident starting in 2016, according to a recent analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. The findings were presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2025.
Breast cancer death rates in young women have dropped sharply in the last decade. The study analyzed data from 11,661 breast cancer deaths among women aged 20-49.
These results show that the collective efforts in improving breast cancer treatment, screening, and care have had a profound impact.
While mortality declined for all racial/ethnic groups, the trends varied significantly:
Marked declines for various groups began in different years, with the most pronounced drops starting in 2016 for non-Hispanic Black women.
The study also revealed unexpected findings regarding luminal A breast cancer:
This suggests a more complex biology in younger women with luminal A, who may experience more aggressive tumors.
Advances in precision medicine and CDK4/6 inhibitors have likely contributed to these positive trends. These treatments became more widely available in 2015-2016, particularly for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative cancers like luminal A.
“We’ve made great strides, but challenges remain, particularly for younger women and racial/ethnic minorities,” said Dr. Adetunji Toriola, the lead author of the study.
The study emphasizes the need for continued research into breast cancer’s molecular mechanisms, particularly in young women.
Key recommendations:
While the reduction in breast cancer mortality is a significant achievement, experts agree that there is still room for improvement, particularly in addressing disparities across racial and ethnic groups.
“We must continue to strive for greater progress in reducing breast cancer mortality and ensuring access to care for all women,” Dr. Toriola emphasized.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
A major study has revealed promising news: breast cancer deaths have dropped significantly in younger women over the past decade. Between 2010 and 2020, breast cancer mortality declined in all subtypes and racial/ethnic groups. The sharpest drops began after 2016. Although breast cancer diagnoses in women under 50 are rising, fewer are dying from the disease. This trend was confirmed using SEER registry data presented at AACR 2025.
Researchers analyzed 11,661 breast cancer deaths between 2010 and 2020.
They looked at subtypes like luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative. Luminal A showed the greatest decline in deaths, especially in 2017. Triple-negative cancers also saw a major drop in 2018. For women aged 20–39, luminal A survival was lower than expected. This challenges assumptions, as luminal A is usually less aggressive.
Non-Hispanic Black women had the highest mortality in 2010 and 2020. Non-Hispanic white women had the lowest in both years. Mortality began falling sooner in some groups.
Biggest drops happened:
Non-Hispanic Black women had the worst 10-year survival. White and Asian/Pacific Islander women had the best. CDK4/6 inhibitors and better endocrine therapies played a major role. These treatments became widely available after 2015.
Understanding tumor biology in younger women remains critical. Access to screening and quality care must improve for all groups. Follow-up was limited to 10 years. Some racial/ethnic groups had small sample sizes.
Bottom Line:
We’ve made real progress in saving lives, but disparities remain. Let’s continue pushing for research, equity, and access to care.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
A groundbreaking AI-powered blood test for early breast cancer detection is offering new hope for patients and doctors alike. Developed by researchers at the University of Edinburgh, this innovative test can detect the earliest signs of breast cancer, potentially before traditional methods can identify the disease.
Researchers at the University of Edinburgh have developed an AI-powered blood test to detect early signs of breast cancer. The test combines laser analysis with machine learning to spot cancer at Stage 1a, the earliest phase.
Current detection methods, like mammograms and biopsies, often miss early signs of breast cancer. This new test, however, can detect subtle changes in the bloodstream that occur when cancer first develops.
The test works by shining a laser into blood plasma. The laser causes tiny chemical changes in the blood, which are analyzed by a spectrometer. AI then interprets the data to identify early cancer markers.
In a pilot study, the new test detected breast cancer with 98% accuracy. The study involved 12 breast cancer patients and 12 healthy controls. The test also identified four major breast cancer subtypes with over 90% accuracy, allowing for more personalized treatment.
Early detection is key to successful cancer treatment. The AI-powered test could help doctors identify breast cancer at its earliest stages, greatly improving the chances of successful treatment. According to Dr. Andy Downes, the lead researcher, early diagnosis can save lives.
Although the test currently focuses on breast cancer, it has the potential to detect other cancers as well. Researchers plan to expand the study to include more participants and test additional cancer types. The goal is to create a universal cancer screening tool.
The team is working to refine the technology and gather more data. They hope to eventually offer this AI-powered blood test as a routine screening tool in medical facilities worldwide. With further development, it could revolutionize early cancer detection.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
A new 10-year study shows that 3D mammography, also known as Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), improves cancer detection. It also reduces the number of advanced cancer cases compared to traditional 2D mammograms. The findings were published in Radiology, a journal by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).
Mammograms are the gold standard for detecting breast cancer early. However, 2D mammograms can miss 20% of breast cancers. These traditional methods also lead to more false-positive results, which means unnecessary follow-up tests.
DBT creates a 3D image of the breast by taking pictures from several angles. This makes it easier for doctors to detect cancer. Studies show that DBT detects more cancers than traditional 2D mammography.
This study compared breast cancer detection using DBT and traditional digital mammograms over 10 years. Researchers at Yale University and Yale-New Haven Health studied over 272,000 mammograms. Most of these mammograms were done using DBT. The study found that DBT detected 1,265 cancers, while 2D mammography found 142 cancers.
DBT detected 5.3% of cancers, compared to 4.0% with traditional mammograms. Importantly, DBT reduced the number of advanced cancers from 43.6% to 32.7%. This means DBT finds cancers at an earlier, more treatable stage.
DBT also reduced the number of women called back for further tests. Only 7.2% of women screened with DBT needed more testing. In comparison, 10.6% of women screened with 2D mammograms were recalled.
DBT helps find cancers earlier while reducing unnecessary follow-up tests. Dr. Liane Philpotts, one of the study’s lead authors, believes this is a positive step forward. She said, “DBT’s lower recall rate and higher cancer detection rate is a win for everyone.”
This study encourages healthcare centers to switch to DBT for breast cancer screening. The researchers hope more studies will confirm the benefits of 3D mammography. For now, the results show that DBT is better at detecting cancer early, which can improve patient outcomes.
DBT’s success gives women a greater chance of early detection and effective treatment.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
Women diagnosed with breast cancer who had annual mammograms were less likely to face late-stage cancer and had better overall survival rates. This is according to new research from the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Study Highlights
The study found that only about 65% of women over age 40 are screened for breast cancer, and only half of these women receive annual screenings. Conflicting guidelines have made it unclear how often women should get screened. The American College of Radiology suggests annual screenings after age 40, while the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends biennial screenings starting at 40.
To address this, researchers used a large database to analyze real-world outcomes for 8,145 breast cancer patients who had at least one mammogram before their diagnosis. They compared the results based on screening intervals: annual (less than 15 months between mammograms), biennial (15 to 27 months), and intermittent (more than 27 months).
The study revealed that 9% of women who had annual screenings had late-stage cancer (stage IIB or worse). In comparison, 14% of those screened biennially and 19% of those with intermittent screenings had late-stage cancer. Additionally, those with annual screenings had significantly better survival rates.
Dr. Margarita Zuley, the study’s lead author, emphasized the benefits of annual mammograms. “Annual screenings are crucial for early detection, which improves survival rates and reduces the intensity of treatments needed,” she said.
While annual mammograms are beneficial, they can also lead to false positives, causing unnecessary biopsies and anxiety. Dr. Zuley acknowledged these concerns but argued that the benefits of early detection outweigh the risks. The team is also working on developing screening tools with fewer false positives.
The study was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. For more details, visit University of Pittsburgh.Annual Mammograms Linked to Better Breast Cancer Outcomes, Study Finds
Stay informed and engaged with the latest advancements. Empower yourself with knowledge and make more informed decisions about your breast cancer treatment and care. Visit the Breast Advocate App website today and join us in the fight against breast cancer.
Are you facing surgery for breast cancer, or considering surgery to decrease your risk of breast cancer?... If so, Breast Advocate® is for you.
Co-created by leading specialists and patient advocates, Breast Advocate® is a free breast cancer surgery app that provides ALL your surgical options along with evidence-based recommendations, personalized for you.
Voted ‘one of the best apps for managing your breast cancer’ by Health Centeral and MUO!
Interested in your own customizable version of the Breast Advocate App for your practice or breast center? Learn more here.
The latest top stories in the world of breast cancer.
How and why Breast Advocate® empowers patients to have a voice in their treatment planning.
We're very proud of our partners! Here's why...
Breast Advocate® was founded by Dr. Minas Chrysopoulo, an internationally recognized expert in breast cancer reconstruction and shared decision-making. Shared decision-making occurs when the health care professional and patient work together to make a treatment decision that is best for the patient. The best decision takes into account evidence-based information about treatment options, the physician's knowledge and experience, and the patient's preferences and values. Multiple studies show this collaborative approach improves patient outcomes and satisfaction.
The Breast Advocate® App is the first shared decision-making app for breast cancer surgery and breast reconstruction. Co-created by breast cancer specialists and patient advocates, Breast Advocate® provides evidence-based information and customized recommendations based on your diagnosis, personal preferences and values. It's your treatment. Our mission is to empower you to have the conversation you want to have with your doctors.
Our breast cancer app educates users in a comprehensive and personalized way about all their breast cancer surgery and reconstruction options, providing access to the latest studies and expert opinions. Regardless of your situation, you will have all the information and tools you need to take a more active role in your consultations and participate fully in the decisions about your treatment.
Need help deciding between procedures? After taking your individual situation and preferences into account, the Wizard provides evidence-based recommendations. If your preferences change after researching your options, you can change the answers to the Wizard’s questions any time and as often as you like.
Breast Advocate® also provides welcomed support. Connect with others who have faced or are facing the same decisions or issues. You don't need to face this alone.
“Going through breast cancer is a team effort.”
“I went from worrying everyday about when I could get breast cancer to finding peace and a new outlook on life.”
“I was fortunate to have been given ALL my breast reconstruction options.”